The Carol Gilligan Theory: A Sense Of Self
The development of identity often relies on a complex mix of factors—such as environmental contributors, one’s own inherent sense of self and the ability to be self-aware. However, certain social and behavioral scientists believe that there may be more to this process. According to psychologist Carol Gilligan, there may be cognitive, moral and relational differences between genders. The question many are asking is: How exactly do these differences come into play regarding one’s sense of self?
Who was Carol Gilligan? Theory, psychological work, and background
Below, we explore implications of Carol Gilligan’s work and theory of moral development. We’ll also discuss how women may form their sense of self, and possible supportive strategies to help one know oneself more intimately.
Moral reasoning and a woman’s sense of self
Gilligan's differences between the genders
In this context, Carol Gilligan proposed that what once was seen as a universal experience of personal introspection and development may actually vary between men and women. She hypothesized that genders possess the inclination and drive to different paths as they work to develop a sense of self. She then hypothesized that these differences can impact every area of a person’s life, from self-awareness to moral judgment and decision-making.
Gilligan believed that a woman's sense of self may not be separate from a man's, insomuch that it is a solid state of identity that is only presented in a single way. However, she is thought by many to believe that there may be differences in the way that sense of self is developed between genders—which can be seen in possible differences between female and male behaviors, ideas and systems of morality.
Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivators
Gilligan continues in her hypothesis, suggesting that external motivators or measurable things might not develop a woman's sense of self; rather, a woman's sense of self may be driven by an intrinsic, interior sense of care, community and responsibility.*
*Please keep in mind that these views and theories reflect one psychologist, Carol Gilligan, and her contributions to the field (discussed in the next section). These views are not an objective, absolute truth and can be extremely harmful when imposed on others in an inappropriate way. Additional study and research is needed to validate the experiences of trans, genderfluid and non-binary folks who may not align with the male or female perspectives.
Development theory
Carol Gilligan is noted by many to be the first person to prominently challenge the Freudian theory that men and women approached morality from inferior and superior perspectives. Carol Gilligan’s ideas regarding moral development were spurred by her disagreements with certain aspects of the work of Lawrence Kohlberg, with whom she worked as a research assistant. Kohlberg’s stages of moral development, she believed, focused only on the way males develop moral reasoning. When tested on moral reasoning within Kohlberg’s system, women displayed an inferior ability to solve moral problems compared to men. Based on her own research, though, Gilligan found that women simply solved moral dilemmas differently than men.
Rather than accepting Kohlberg’s theory of moral development, in which women had perceived deficiencies in moral thinking, Gilligan developed her own psychological theory. She suggested that women make moral decisions using a different framework than men. Women’s development of moral decision-making skills, Gilligan suggests, are focused on relationships, connection, and care. Kohlberg’s stages of moral development, on the other hand, emphasized the importance of operating within a set of rules that are universally applied. In short, she generally believed that men and women may not be inferior or superior to the other but are simply different when it comes to moral reasoning.
Three stages of the Carol Gilligan theory of moral development
According to Gilligan’s hypothesis, the possible feelings of alienation and separation that many women can feel as well (as the social pressures they may experience) can be borne of a man's view of the world. This view, Gilligan believed, can be governed by morality ruled by judgments and logic—while a woman's sense of morality, self and navigation of the world may be ruled by the desire to feel connected and responsible.
Sense of community and its effects on female psychology
We may see this dichotomy reflected further in Gilligans work, as she believed that much of the world may still be structured to fit a man's sense of self—possibly forcing women to find connection and solace in friendships with one another. This is regarded by many as one of the more harmonizing points of Gilligan’s hypotheses, as she notes that women can find community within their own, no matter what situation they may find themselves in.
This automatic sense of community can be an important part of women’s experience in society, helping many to feel as though they belong, they are living in line with their values and they are contributing to the world as a whole. Conversely, Gilligan believed that men might feel as though they must contribute with money, power or similarly visible assets.
She then concluded that women may derive their identity through the people they surround themselves with, their ability to care for others and their ability to fulfill their responsibilities in whatever societal context they currently are within. Gilligan went on to hypothesize that this potential difference may demonstrate an important (but not inferior) difference between those who identify as female and male.
Who is Carol Gilligan and what are Gilligan's contributions to psychology?
Carol Gilligan is generally known as a Harvard-educated psychologist and is applauded by many for her contributions to women's studies within psychology. Born in New York City in 1936, Gilligan graduated from Swarthmore College in 1958. After earning a master’s degree in clinical psychology at Radcliffe College, she attended Harvard University, where she earned a PhD in social psychology.
Following a teaching stint at the University of Chicago, Gilligan returned to Harvard in 1979, where she worked as a professor in the School of Education. In 1997, she became the Patricia Albjerg Professor of Gender Studies, a position she held until 2002, when she began teaching at New York University. It was during her time as a professor at Harvard that Gilligan began forming her theory of moral development. Along with In a Different Voice, Gilligan has authored, co-authored, and edited several books, including Meeting at the Crossroads: Women’s Psychology and Girls’ Development and The Birth of Pleasure: A New Map of Love.
Carol Gilligan's impact on psychology: Moral development, moral reasoning, and more
Carol Gilligan’s stages of moral development represented a significant advance in the field of developmental psychology. Gilligan has also been an influential figure in the feminist movement, as she was generally determined to make sure the experiences, viewpoints and ideas of women were listened to and acknowledged. Before Gilligan, it was not generally considered uncommon to exclude women from psychological studies, a standard which possibly created significant gender gaps in the study of psychology as a whole. This consequence is regarded by many as something that occurred in addition to the exclusion of women from more rigorous study and, consequently, treatment, which was thought to have possible generational effects.
How to improve your sense of self: Supportive strategies for all genders
Contexts of womanhood and gender
Understanding the patriarchy's impact on moral reasoning
Connecting with others to expand your social circle
How can online therapy support you?
How effective is online therapy?
Takeaway
- Previous Article
- Next Article