Influential Psychology Experiments
Human psychology is often called a "soft science" because conclusions in certain types of studies or psychology experiments may be up to greater interpretation in psychology than in hard sciences like chemistry or biology. However, all sciences are interconnected, and psychology is real science.
Many influential psychologists throughout history have encouraged people to treat psychology more like other sciences. For example, when you think about chemistry, you might think about experiments. In psychology, professionals study human behavior. There are many experiments carried out in psychological studies as well, and psychiatrists are as much medical doctors as other types of doctors, often studying how the body and mind interact, but with a special focus on the mind. Understanding these studies can help you understand mental health more profoundly.
Famous experiments in psychology
Harlow’s monkey mother experiments – Importance of early attachments
While teaching at the University of Wisconsin, psychologist Harry Harlow began conducting experiments on young rhesus monkeys, separating them from their mothers. He then made two surrogate mothers for the infant monkeys—one made of wire and one of terry cloth. The wire mother provided the monkeys with milk through a bottle, while the cloth mother had no food.
Harlow’s experiment highlights the importance of early attachments, affection, and tactile connection. His findings had a substantial influence on John Bowlby, who went on to develop attachment theory. Despite its impact, due to the study’s design, it is considered one of the most unethical psychology experiments of the 20th century.
The Stanford prison experiment – Situational Influences on human behavior
The Stanford Prison Experiment was a landmark study in psychology conducted by social psychology professor Philip Zimbardo in 1971 at Stanford University and is one of the most famous psychology experiments of the 1900s. The study was designed to investigate the psychological effects of power dynamics and social roles in a simulated prison environment and is one the most controversial experiments in psychology.
Zimbardo recruited 24 male college students to participate in the study. Each student participant was randomly assigned to play the role of either a prisoner or a guard. The participants were carefully screened for psychological and physical health before participating. The simulated prison was set up in the basement of the famous psychology department, with the cells, prison guards' quarters, and other facilities modeled on an actual prison.
The experiment was supposed to last for two weeks, but it was terminated after only six days due to the escalating abuse of power by the guards and the psychological distress experienced by the prisoners. The guards quickly became authoritarian and abusive, using physical punishment, psychological intimidation to exert their authority over the prisoners. The prisoners, in turn, became increasingly submissive and passive, often displaying signs of depression, anxiety, and helplessness.
If you or a loved one is experiencing abuse, contact the Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE (7233). Support is available 24/7.
The Stanford Prison Experiment is considered controversial for a number of reasons. Critics argue that the study was unethical and that the human subjects were subjected to undue stress and harm. Additionally, some psychologists have questioned the validity of the study, arguing that it lacked scientific rigor and was too heavily influenced by Zimbardo's own biases and expectations. The study remains a landmark in the history of the psychology of cognitive dissonance and continues to inspire further research into the psychology of power and social roles.
The Little Albert experiment – Conditioning emotional responses
The Little Albert experiment was a controversial study conducted by John B. Watson and his graduate student, Rosalie Rayner, in 1920. Watson and Rayner wanted to learn more about healthy childhood development and emotional development. The study used classical conditioning and aimed to investigate whether a conditioned emotional response could be established in a human infant.
Little Albert was an 11-month-old baby who was selected as the subject of the study. Initially, Albert was presented with various stimuli, including a white rat, a rabbit, a dog, and a monkey. Albert showed no fear or anxiety towards any of these stimuli.
The Little Albert experiment has been criticized for ethical reasons. Many psychologists argue that the study was unethical because it caused unnecessary psychological harm to the infant. Moreover, the study's scientific validity has been questioned because the experiment lacked controls, and the results were not systematically measured.
The Bobo doll psychology experiment – Learned social behaviors
The Bobo doll experiment was a study conducted by Albert Bandura in 1961 to investigate the effects of observational learning on aggressive behavior in children. The study aimed to demonstrate how children learn and imitate aggressive behaviors through observation and modeling.
In the experiment, children between the ages of three and six were divided into three groups: a control group, one group that observed a model being physically aggressive toward a Bobo doll, and one group that observed a model being verbally aggressive toward the doll. The children were then placed in a playroom with a Bobo doll and aggressive toys, and their behavior was observed.
The results of the study showed that the children who observed the aggressive adults were more likely to imitate the same behaviors than those who did not. Furthermore, the children who observed the verbally aggressive model were also more likely to use aggressive language toward the doll. A landmark child development study, the Bobo doll experiment, demonstrated that children can learn new behaviors through observation and modeling, even if those behaviors are aggressive or violent.
The Finland basic income experiment – Increased well-being and employment
Universal Basic Income is the idea of giving everyone a fixed income regardless of whether they work. The idea is often considered a part of economics or government. Still, psychologists have questioned how people would behave in a society where they were not required to work.
Supporters believe that universal basic income would improve society by allowing individuals to do what they love rather than chase money. Thinkers going back to the ancient Greek philosopher Socrates have said that when individuals pursue their interests and natural skills, society is better off.
Critics believe it would damage society and lead to group conflict because no one would pursue higher-order jobs if they didn't work to live. They often point out necessary, non-automated, undesirable, and low-paying jobs that may not be filled if people were less incentivized by money because of a base income.
There is little room for critics to come up with ethical concerns. The influence of the study was positive, and the experiment's size and ambition serve as a model for other countries attempting similar experiments, including Germany.
The Visual Cliff Experiment – Depth perception in infants
The previous studies discussed in this article were conducted for a limited time by groups of researchers. However, some experiments were conducted once and immediately recognized as valuable. One such experiment is the Visual Cliff Experiment.
Designed by Eleanor Gibson and Richard Walk in 1960, the Visual Cliff Experiment tested how and when young children develop depth perception and understand their relationships with their surroundings.
The test utilized a sheet with a checker pattern. The sheet was laid over a trench about a foot deep, making the drop-off visible. Heavy glass was placed over both sides of the trench, making the trench visible but safe to cross. A crawling child was then placed on one side of the trench with a parent on the other, coaxing the child to cross. Observers could then see the age at which a child recognizes the perceived drop-off and becomes hesitant to cross and identified this age as six to ten months, which was earlier than previously thought.
The children also reacted to the visual cliff in several different ways. Some turned around and tried to back over the cliff as though they were trying to descend a stair. Others reached out with a hand to test the depth of the visual cliff. The experiment helped establish that children of this age often fall not because they are unaware of depth but because their depth perception matures faster than the motor ability to navigate it.
Counseling and support options for you
There are now thousands of psychological studies on many topics regarding mental health. Learning about these studies can help you further understand how the mind and body interact and which types of treatments are most effective for specific mental health challenges. If you're looking for guidance in choosing a type of psychological support, several resources are available to you.
Online therapy can help
Many individuals appreciate the convenience, cost-effectiveness, and value of online therapy services, like those offered through platforms like BetterHelp. With BetterHelp, you can meet with a therapist from home, specify the specialty in which you'd like to receive support, and choose between phone, video, or live chat sessions.
There have also been scientific studies on the effectiveness of online therapy. Even methods like online chat messaging therapy have been proven as effective as face-to-face sessions and can reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, and other mental health conditions. You do not need to have a diagnosis to receive support, and millions of clients reach out for help each year.
Takeaway
Past psychological experiments designed to learn about human behavior have led to many breakthroughs in treatment, but some of the famous psychology experiments were controversial, such as:
- the Stanford Prison Experiment, in which ordinary people simulated prisoners and prison guards
- the Bobo Doll Experiment studying aggressive behavior
- the Little Albert Experiment, which used classical conditioning to elicit certain responses to stimuli
Experimental psychology serves a purpose, but the experiment should be designed to yield useful information without compromising the mental health of the participants.
If you're interested in learning more about psychology or talking to someone about your mental health, consider reaching out to a psychologist to get started.
Frequently asked questions
Read more below for answers to questions commonly asked about psychology experiments.
What is the most famous experiment in psychology?
One of the most famous experiments in psychology is the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971. It explored the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers.
What is a psychological experiment example?
An example of a psychological experiment is the Milgram Obedience Experiment, where participants were instructed to administer electric shocks to a learner. The study aimed to understand the extent to which individuals would follow orders from an authority figure, even when it involved harming another person.
What is a good psychology experiment?
A good psychology experiment is the Bobo Doll Experiment by Albert Bandura, which studied children's behavior after watching an adult model act aggressively towards a Bobo doll. The findings demonstrated the impact of observational learning on behavior.
What is the purpose of psychological experiments?
The purpose of a psychological experiment is to investigate hypotheses about behavior and mental processes under controlled conditions. These experiments aim to understand how various factors influence thoughts, emotions, and actions, providing insights into human psychology.
- Previous Article
- Next Article