Irving Janis
Have you ever wondered why people in power with plenty of experience and resources can still make such poor decisions sometimes? While it’s understandable how one person’s judgment could become easily clouded by outside factors, it would seem that a group of political leaders should be able to control for such influences. Political psychology questions like these were what American psychologist Irving Janis dedicated his career to. As a result of his research in the field, Janis proposed the concept of groupthink, which he posited can negatively influence the decisions that groups of people may come to. Read on to learn more about Janis, his work, and this core element of it.
Irving Janis was an American psychologist who was born in Buffalo, New York in 1918. As a young adult, he studied psychology at the University of Chicago before going on to earn his PhD from Columbia University in New York. After joining the psychology department at Yale University, Irving Janis began working as a researcher, primarily studying psychological distress and personal decision-making.
Groupthink and foreign policy decisions
Irving Janis’ research led him to study group decision-making—especially as it relates to political psychology—and eventually publish his groundbreaking book, Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Houghton Mifflin, 1972). In his book, Janis explains how groupthink makes it hard for individuals to question a group’s decisions. Irving Janis then makes the case that groups previously in charge of the United States’ foreign policy were influenced by such dynamics. Janis wrote several other books on groupthink and the decision-making process, including A Practical Guide to Making Decisions (Free Press, 1980) and Stress, Attitudes, and Decisions: Selected Papers (Praeger, 1982).
Janis' later career and death
Irving Janis received the Socio-Psychological Prize from the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1967, and the APA’s Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award in 1981. He retired from Yale University in 1985, and in 1986 he was made Adjunct Professor of Psychology Emeritus at the University of California. His involvement in groupthink research continued until his death. While working as an adjunct professor, Janis wrote his last book, Crucial Decisions: Leadership in Policy-making and Crisis Management (Free Press, 1989). Irving Janis died of lung cancer on November 15, 1990. Today, Janis is best remembered for this groupthink theory.
What is political psychology?
Political psychology is a discipline that studies politics, politicians, and psychological principles related to both. Researchers in this field want to understand why political leaders behave the way they do, how they interact with each other, and what the outcomes of those interactions are for the populations they represent. It was within the realm of political and social psychology that Irving Janis developed his concept of groupthink.
Irving Janis and the groupthink concept
As a result, group members may fail to adequately consider all possible options, and any one person’s ability to dissent or push back against the status quo may seem limited or impossible. Groupthink discourages highly creative choices and solutions and, in Janis's estimation, tends to result in disastrous outcomes.
How groupthink influences crucial decisions
Groupthink can occur in any type of group, from individuals gathered together for a class project to high-level political leaders gathered to address a serious issue. According to Irving Janis, symptoms of this phenomenon that suggest it may be likely to occur include:
- Rationalization, which can happen when the group begins to settle on an answer
- Morality, when the group believes their cause is right and are willing to do whatever it takes to advance it
- Stereotypes, meaning that they assume that anyone in the outgroup is inferior
- Pressure, which the group may feel once they’ve developed a perspective on the issue
- Self-censorship, causing anyone who may have doubts about the group consensus to keep those doubts to themselves
- Unanimity, or the assumption that the decision the majority comes to is unanimous
How to avoid groupthink
In addition to identifying the theory of groupthink and the situations in which it’s likely to occur, Janis also suggested measures that group leaders and participants can use to try and prevent it from happening in his book Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. These include:
- Leaders taking an impartial stance on the issue or new policy to alleviate the pressure to conform
- Experts on the topic being invited to express their perspectives one at a time so the group can consider all the relevant information and perspectives
- Someone in the group playing devil’s advocate to help evaluate different ideas from various perspectives
- Splitting the groups into smaller sub-groups to discuss, and then reconvening
- Making a specific effort to consider how those affected by the decision will respond—especially if they are rival nations, in the case of major political choices
How groupthink may affect your life
How therapy can help
Takeaway
Frequently asked questions
What is groupthink as coined by Irving Janis?
Groupthink is a phenomenon that social psychologist Irving Janis first recognized in his famous 1972 study called "Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes."In researching for this study, Janis explored the psychological factors behind foreign policy decisions in the Vietnam War, the Bay of Pigs, and the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Janis determined that behind these decisions were highly intelligent people in small, cohesive groups to adopt beliefs and biases that they assumed others of the group held.
What is groupthink in psychology?
What is an example of groupthink?
What are the 8 symptoms of groupthink?
- Having the illusion that your group is invulnerable or can't be wrong
- Having the illusion that the group agrees unanimously
- Believing in the group's morality and its choices without question
- Stereotyping any opponents
- Having "mind guards" that create barriers to alternative views or negative information
- Engaging in self-censorship
Why is groupthink dangerous?
Why is groupthink bad?
What are the characteristics of groupthink?
- Lack creativity
- Make bad decisions
- No one in the group dares to disagree
- Overconfidence
- Failure to recognize the best solutions
Which of the following is a symptom of groupthink?
- Sense of invulnerability
- Discounting or ignoring negative feedback
- Believing the group's morality is perfect beyond question
- Stereotyping opponents
- Rationalizing negative choices as a group
- Blocking opposing views within the group
- Applying pressure to anyone who disagrees
- Censoring oneself to avoid disagreeing with the group
- Believing the entire group agrees, whether they do or not
Can groupthink be positive?
What is the best example of groupthink?
What is groupthink and how can it affect an organization?
- Holds back people with innovative ideas
- This prevents the group from analyzing situations thoroughly and rationally.
How do you deal with groupthink?
- Increase the diversity of the group
- Seek and consider outside opinions and evaluations
- Allow spaces for alone time within the working environment
- Require discussion of many viewpoints before decisions are made
- Show appreciation for many different perspectives
Is groupthink always bad?
How do you escape groupthink?
- Demand critical evaluation of all ideas.
- Don't offer your opinions when the group discusses options.
- Create a competitive environment by dividing a larger cohesive group into smaller groups.
- Bring in an outside expert to participate in the discussion and evaluation of ideas.
- Appoint someone to be the devil's advocate to promote consideration of opposing ideas.
What causes groupthink?
- Extreme group cohesiveness
- Group isolation
- Overbearing group leaders
- Stress and pressure surrounding the decisions that need to be made
- The leaders haven't created a standard way of evaluating options
- The group has had significant failures after recent decisions.
- Previous Article
- Next Article